<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A.R.C. Project Gets Boost From Federal Approval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.transitblogger.com/nj-transit/arc-project-gets-federal-approval.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.transitblogger.com/nj-transit/arc-project-gets-federal-approval.php</link>
	<description>Covering the MTA, NYC Subway, LIRR, Metro-North &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:37:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: anon.</title>
		<link>http://www.transitblogger.com/nj-transit/arc-project-gets-federal-approval.php/comment-page-1/#comment-22929</link>
		<dc:creator>anon.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transitblogger.com/?p=1738#comment-22929</guid>
		<description>ARC -- well, the new tunnels under the Hudson are good, but the project has turned into a mess, with a giant underground station which can&#039;t be extended eastward, with poor exit locations, at tremendous expense.  And it&#039;ll take forever to build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARC &#8212; well, the new tunnels under the Hudson are good, but the project has turned into a mess, with a giant underground station which can&#8217;t be extended eastward, with poor exit locations, at tremendous expense.  And it&#8217;ll take forever to build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.transitblogger.com/nj-transit/arc-project-gets-federal-approval.php/comment-page-1/#comment-22893</link>
		<dc:creator>James Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transitblogger.com/?p=1738#comment-22893</guid>
		<description>I believe the ARC will be a very big boost to transit in and out of NYC, and will go a long way towards helping alleviate traffic / transit problems.  I have another idea, complimentary to the ARC, that would help traffic inside of NJ and also revitalize areas that are currently somewhat run down in several Essex and Hudson County towns.  The plan involves taking over abandoned and unused passenger and freight rail lines and using them to extend the Newark City Subway / Light Rail.  The new system would extend from Montclair to Hoboken and from East Newark to Clifton, though the tracks do go as far north as Paterson.  Here&#039;s a link to my proposal: 

http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgqvrqtt_18dxmcbtrt

Let me know what you think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the ARC will be a very big boost to transit in and out of NYC, and will go a long way towards helping alleviate traffic / transit problems.  I have another idea, complimentary to the ARC, that would help traffic inside of NJ and also revitalize areas that are currently somewhat run down in several Essex and Hudson County towns.  The plan involves taking over abandoned and unused passenger and freight rail lines and using them to extend the Newark City Subway / Light Rail.  The new system would extend from Montclair to Hoboken and from East Newark to Clifton, though the tracks do go as far north as Paterson.  Here&#8217;s a link to my proposal: </p>
<p><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgqvrqtt_18dxmcbtrt" rel="nofollow">http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgqvrqtt_18dxmcbtrt</a></p>
<p>Let me know what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.transitblogger.com/nj-transit/arc-project-gets-federal-approval.php/comment-page-1/#comment-22891</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.transitblogger.com/?p=1738#comment-22891</guid>
		<description>With the regularity of trains breaking down in the current tunnels and delays suffered by commuters, there is clearly a need to relieve the bottleneck into Penn station.  Also, with the long planning times and known political wrangling, one would not want to do anything to slow down, or potentially stop the progress on the Access to the Region&#039;s Core tunnel project.  

However, when one stands back and takes a look at the bigger picture the following emerges:

1	Penn Station is overcrowded 
2	The streets around Penn station cannot handle the pedestrian traffic
3	Commuter passengers from New Jersey arriving at Penn station work in the Financial district, Midtown, or uptown.  Only a percentage of passengers actually want to be in the vicinity of Penn station.
4	New Jersey Transit focuses its rides to Penn station using the one-seat rides concept, but commuters have to change seats to use the subway, or cabs, to get to their ultimate destinations.
5	There is currently a project underway to develop a second station under Grand Central.  This will provide access from Queens.
6	The 7 Line extension currently under construction will go from Grand Central and pass underneath the Port Authority.

So:
1	Why not build the new tunnels to go to Grand Central, and provide a stop at the Port Authority.?  The new 7 Line under construction can be used between PA and Grand Central.
2	Provide New York downtown PATH access to/from Secaucus Junction.
3	Turn Secaucus Junction into the main transportation hub in New Jersey from where commuters can choose which part of Manhattan (or Long Island) they want to go to.  Commuters will then have access to all of Manhattan from within NJ.

Benefits:  This will:

1	Provide a “Most Convenient Seat” rather than a “One Seat” ride.  This will take commuters more closely to their end destination.  Please consider the commuters overall ride, not just their NJ portion of the ride.
2	Reduce train and commuter congestion at Penn station
3	Reduce pedestrian congestion around Penn station
4	Provide high capacity alternatives for emergency situations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the regularity of trains breaking down in the current tunnels and delays suffered by commuters, there is clearly a need to relieve the bottleneck into Penn station.  Also, with the long planning times and known political wrangling, one would not want to do anything to slow down, or potentially stop the progress on the Access to the Region&#8217;s Core tunnel project.  </p>
<p>However, when one stands back and takes a look at the bigger picture the following emerges:</p>
<p>1	Penn Station is overcrowded<br />
2	The streets around Penn station cannot handle the pedestrian traffic<br />
3	Commuter passengers from New Jersey arriving at Penn station work in the Financial district, Midtown, or uptown.  Only a percentage of passengers actually want to be in the vicinity of Penn station.<br />
4	New Jersey Transit focuses its rides to Penn station using the one-seat rides concept, but commuters have to change seats to use the subway, or cabs, to get to their ultimate destinations.<br />
5	There is currently a project underway to develop a second station under Grand Central.  This will provide access from Queens.<br />
6	The 7 Line extension currently under construction will go from Grand Central and pass underneath the Port Authority.</p>
<p>So:<br />
1	Why not build the new tunnels to go to Grand Central, and provide a stop at the Port Authority.?  The new 7 Line under construction can be used between PA and Grand Central.<br />
2	Provide New York downtown PATH access to/from Secaucus Junction.<br />
3	Turn Secaucus Junction into the main transportation hub in New Jersey from where commuters can choose which part of Manhattan (or Long Island) they want to go to.  Commuters will then have access to all of Manhattan from within NJ.</p>
<p>Benefits:  This will:</p>
<p>1	Provide a “Most Convenient Seat” rather than a “One Seat” ride.  This will take commuters more closely to their end destination.  Please consider the commuters overall ride, not just their NJ portion of the ride.<br />
2	Reduce train and commuter congestion at Penn station<br />
3	Reduce pedestrian congestion around Penn station<br />
4	Provide high capacity alternatives for emergency situations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

